Server components (React Server Components)

React Server Components (RSC) is an approach where some components run only on the server: they form markup, access data directly, but do NOT send their code to the browser. Only what is genuinely interactive reaches the client. The goal is to reduce client JavaScript size, speed up loading and simplify data access on the server. Honestly about novelty, this matters: RSC is a relatively new and actively evolving technology. Approaches and best practices are still settling, tools change, there are fewer ready solutions and experienced specialists than in mature approaches. This means a certain risk and the need to follow changes. We honestly say this. Honestly about mindset shift and complexity: RSC require rethinking the usual React model — what runs on the server, what on the client, where the boundary is, how they interact. This adds cognitive complexity and complicates debugging (you must understand where code runs). The team needs to master this. Honestly about ecosystem lock: RSC are closely tied to React and frameworks like Next.js — this is a lock to a specific stack. If you are not on React, RSC do not apply to you. Honestly about 'excessive for the simple': for a simple site or content page RSC are excessive — there ordinary SSG/SSR is simpler and more reliable. RSC are justified for apps with many components and data where reducing client JS genuinely matters. Honestly about 'no speed guarantee': RSC help reduce the client bundle, but the final speed depends on the implementation (what was moved to the server, data handling, overall architecture). The mere fact of RSC does not guarantee speed. Honestly about the effect: for suitable React apps they reduce client JS and improve loading, but it is a new complex technology, not justified for everyone. Honestly about access: a React stack, a team, an understanding of the server/client boundary are needed. An important boundary: this is RSC; islands — 1053; partial hydration — 1058; SSR/SSG/ISR — 1052. Picture this: instead of 'a heavy client bundle' — server components that send only what is needed to the browser, where it is justified. The base price starts from 70,000 ₽ (depends on the app).

• A large client JS bundle slows down a React app's loading.
• Many components pull their code into the browser unnecessarily.
• You want RSC but it is unclear whether they are justified or too early.
• RSC were implemented chaotically — confusion at the server/client boundary.

• Implementing RSC: rendering part of the UI on the server without sending its JS
• A clear server/client boundary and component interaction
• An honest assessment: are RSC justified (React stack, scale, maturity risk)
• Accounting for the technology's novelty and mindset shift
• Honest boundaries (new and evolving; complexity+mindset shift; React lock; no speed guarantee)
• A link with islands (1053), partial hydration (1058), SSR/SSG (1052)
• A maintenance plan and following changes
• Handover and review with you

• Less client JS — faster loading (for suitable apps)
• Only the genuinely interactive reaches the browser
• An honest feasibility and maturity assessment
• Honest boundaries (a new complex technology; React lock; no guarantee)

• We assess the stack, scale and justification for RSC
• If yes — we implement with a clear server/client boundary
• We account for novelty/risk, honestly set boundaries with you

• Will RSC speed up my app?

  They will help reduce client JS — yes, guarantee speed — no, honestly: the final speed depends on the implementation (what was moved to the server, data handling, architecture). The mere fact of RSC does not guarantee speed. Plus for a simple site they are excessive — ordinary SSG/SSR is simpler. RSC are justified for large React apps where reducing the client bundle genuinely matters. We will honestly assess whether they give a gain for you specifically.

• Are RSC already a mature standard?

  No, honestly: RSC is a relatively new and actively evolving technology. Approaches and best practices are still settling, tools change, there are fewer experienced specialists. This is a certain risk and the need to follow changes. This does not mean 'do not use', but the decision must be deliberate. We honestly indicate the maturity and risk rather than pass RSC off as a trouble-free standard.

• Will RSC suit any project?

  No, honestly: RSC are closely tied to React/Next — if you are not on React, they do not apply to you. And for a simple site/content page they are excessive (SSG/SSR is simpler). RSC are justified for apps with many components and data. Plus they require a mindset shift (server/client boundary) and complicate debugging. We will honestly assess whether it is your case rather than implement RSC for hype.