Site quality · Mobile

Ionic

We develop an app in Ionic: we use web technologies (HTML/CSS/JS) inside a mobile shell — fast and economical, especially if you have web assets and a team. Good for content and business apps. Honestly upfront: Ionic runs through a WebView (essentially web inside an app), so on heavy tasks and complex animation performance is below native, React Native or Flutter — it is a trade-off for speed and budget, not 'the best quality always'.

Price
$30,000
Duration
usually weeks–months (depends on functionality)

Ionic — overview

Ionic — price, timeline & scope

A cross-platform Ionic app is developing a single app in familiar web technologies (HTML/CSS/JavaScript, often with Angular/React/Vue), packaged into a mobile shell and running on iOS and Android, with access to device capabilities via plugins. The main plus is savings and speed, especially if you ALREADY have a web team and assets: the web stack is reused, one codebase for both platforms. Honestly about the essence of the technology, this is key: Ionic renders the UI in a WebView — i.e. it is essentially a web app inside a native shell. Hence the trade-off: for content, informational and typical business apps (catalogs, forms, personal accounts, directories) it is excellent and imperceptible to the user; but on HEAVY tasks (complex graphics, abundant animation, games, intensive computation) performance and 'nativeness' are noticeably below native (833/834), React Native (835) or Flutter (836). We will honestly say whether Ionic suits your task or another approach is better. Honestly about device capabilities: access to the camera, geo, etc. goes through plugins — most are covered, but for rare/new native APIs additional native code is sometimes needed. Honestly about scale and costs: a large project; Apple/Google accounts (separate), store review, payment commissions. Honestly about maintenance: updates for new OS and dependencies are ongoing work. Honestly about success: we do not guarantee downloads/revenue (marketing and ASO 844+ are needed). Honestly about access: requirements/design are needed. An important boundary: this is Ionic; native are 833/834, RN is 835, Flutter is 836, PWA is 839. Picture this: instead of 'expensive development from scratch' — an app on your web skills where that is enough. The base price starts from 150,000 ₽ (depends on functionality).

Problems we solve

  • You have a web team and assets, but mobile is built expensively from scratch.
  • You need both platforms on a limited budget and timeline.
  • The app is mainly content/business (catalog, forms, account).
  • You do not want to maintain a separate native stack for a simple app.

What's included in the Ionic service

  • Development of an Ionic app (web stack) for iOS+Android
  • Reuse of web skills and code
  • Access to device capabilities via plugins
  • An honest assessment: whether Ionic suits or another approach is needed
  • Help with App Store and Google Play publishing
  • Indicating boundaries (WebView: lower performance on heavy tasks)
  • A maintenance plan (OS/dependency updates)
  • Handover and review with you

What you get

  • An app for both platforms on your web stack
  • Budget and time savings for typical apps
  • Access to device capabilities via plugins
  • Suits content/business apps (heavy performance — otherwise)

How the work goes: steps

  • We clarify the task and check whether Ionic suits (vs RN/Flutter/native); collect spec
  • We develop on the web stack, add plugins, test on both OS
  • We publish to both stores, honestly set boundaries and a maintenance plan

Why PDV Expert

  • Fixed price and timeline — no surprises on the invoice.
  • Report and recommendations in plain language — clear without a technical background.
  • In touch at every step and answering questions about the result.

FAQ

  • Is Ionic worse than native and Flutter?

    It is a trade-off, not 'worse at everything'. Ionic runs through a WebView (web inside a shell): for content and business apps this is imperceptible while being cheaper and faster, especially if you have a web team. But on heavy graphics, animation and computation, performance is below native/Flutter. If the product's core is exactly that — we will honestly advise another approach.

  • When is Ionic a good choice?

    When the app is mainly content/business (catalogs, forms, personal accounts, directories), you need both platforms, the budget is limited, and especially if you already have web skills and assets. Then Ionic saves resources without a noticeable quality loss for the user. We will honestly say whether it is your case.

  • Are the costs only for development?

    No. As for other approaches: paid Apple and Google accounts are needed, both stores take a commission on payments/subscriptions and do review (can reject). Plus ongoing maintenance for new OS and dependency versions. Honestly budget for this; we will calculate by your spec.

About the provider

The «Ionic» service is provided by PDV Expert — a team specialising in «Site quality». We work under contract and deliver a written report with recommendations.

Prepared by PDV Expert · updated